Thursday, October 22, 2020
My Top 100 Albums (75-51)
Sunday, September 27, 2020
My Top 100 Albums (100-76)
Honorable mentions: Top Gun, Cruel Intentions, Varsity Blues, Space Jam, Guardians of the Galaxy, Garden State, Streets of Fire, Orange County, Forrest Gump and Into the Spider-verse.
I can already hear the outcry of the four
people who are still reading this list when it concludes in January: "The soundtrack to this 1998 box office bomb made it but
(insert deserving album) didn't?!?"
Correct. That's the fun of these
lists. So now, ladies and gentlemen of
the musical jury, hear me out.
Godzilla: The Album was released in 1998 in the heyday of when every
major summer movie release was accompanied by a soundtrack that
were really just a compilation of popular bands/artists of the day. Sometimes the song wasn't even in the movie. But in the
pre-Spotify or even Napster days, this was essentially a mix tape with your
favorite bands and maybe the chance to discover a new band along the way. This album is not only an encapsulation the
movie machine product but also a great look into the rock music landscape at the time of
the movie's release in 1998.
The bands on the album included The Wallflowers who were still riding
high off the smash “One Headlight”, Rage Against The Machine in its prime, Ben Folds Five,
Foo Fighters, Fuel, Green Day, Jamiroqui, Days of the New, Silverchair, and, of course, Puff
Daddy in all his sampling glory taking on one of the holy grails of guitar
riffs from Led Zeppelin’s “Kashmir” with Jimmy Page supplying the actual guitar
work.
To a 13-year-old perusing the CD section of Best Buy, that’s
a who’s who list of 1998's bands.
The Puff Daddy/Jimmy Page collaboration “Come With Me” was the touted crown
jewel and easily the most popular song on the album. How could it not be with that guitar work
supplying the foundation? I didn’t know
what they were doing was sacrilege to rock and roll history as some critics
were writing. And The Wallflowers
covered Bowie’s “Heroes” which many kids (self included) didn’t even know was a
cover. Rage Against the Machine was
doing Rage Against the Machine things like writing in the "No
Shelter" lyrics the line "Godzilla pure motherf*ckin' filler, get
your minds off the real killer" thus insinuating that we're all sheep for
buying this album and watching this movie.
Throw in a passable Foo Fighters song and Green Day lending “Brain Stew”
with some Godzilla sounds mixed in and you have the gist of the album.
Many of the songs aren't available on Spotify and that's probably for the best as this album is best left as a 1998 memory. The movie soundtrack is still used (Bright, Into the Spider-verse) but it's less prevalent now, much like the movie-going experience itself.
I'm certainly
not advocating that this album be placed in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame but
to put together a personal list while leaving out an album that was so
important to me growing up felt wrong.
Almost as wrong as studios choosing to continue to remake Godzilla
movies.
It may be one of the only times that a movie’s soundtrack
has more ongoing discussion about it than the movie itself. I listened to this album so many times. It had to be a part of the list. Much like the Aeropostale shirts I brought
along to college freshman year, it’s not a good look but it’s part of my past
and I have to acknowledge its impact.
As a closing note, “Come With Me” may not be on Spotify but
the music video lives on. It’s
fantastic. It might as well be called “This
is the 1990s”.
Monday, September 24, 2012
Review: Warrior
I don’t fit the conventional definition of a tough guy. Unless the conventional definition consists of avoiding physical confrontation at all costs. Or someone who, when told there is a “Widow-Maker” ski run, asks if there is a “Die-A-Virgin-Maker run that can be taken instead. Given my previously stated manliness it’s hard for me at times to even watch the brutal beating doled out by Mixed Martial Arts fighters. I don’t dislike the sport and will watch it if it’s on. Knowing that about myself I was skeptical that I would like the film “Warrior” going in.
“Warrior” tells the story of two brothers separated in their youth by an alcoholic and abusive father (Nick Nolte with an Oscar nominated performance) who both turn to competing in an MMA tournament for the five million dollar cash prize to solve their respective money problems. Brendan, played by the very underrated Joel Edgerton (“Animal Kingdom” and the upcoming “Zero Dark Thirty” and “The Great Gatsby”), is a semi-retired fighter now working as a physics teacher with a loving wife and two kids and with an underwater mortgage (as opposed to a flailing-in-the-water-without-a-life-jacket mortgage). Due to Brendan’s age and his mediocre past record as a fighter, he is the film’s underdog.
His brother, Tommy, is played by the rising star “holy hell he took steroids for this” Tom Hardy. Both actors were in incredible shape but it looks like Hardy took steroids to get better at taking steroids. I think he’s ruining the integrity of acting and that there should be an asterisk next to all his acting accolades from now on. I’m kidding but seriously, Clemens and Bonds, I hate you. Moving on. Hardy shows up on the door of his newly sober and newly Christian father. Despite escaping with his mother the destructive home life and then enlisting in the army years ago, Tommy’s back with a proposition that his father train him for the MMA tournament. Tommy’s one condition to his father is that the request not be viewed as an attempt at reconciliation with his father.
If Brendan is the underdog of the film then Tommy is the over-dog. Or rather he’s a Bengal tiger with an AK-47 strapped to his back in a dog suit. In other words he absolutely destroys opponents. Tommy quickly becomes a YouTube sensation and crowd favorite thus attracting the attention of the media who unearth some secrets about why he’s home from the Army. This is the only part of film with which I took exception. If Tommy wanted to keep a low profile while he was home then perhaps entering a televised and media-saturated MMA tournament with 16 of the best middleweight fighters in the world wasn't the greatest of ideas. I guess that Tommy can’t help what his natural strengths are, much like my ability to eat an unnatural amount of peanut butter cookies. No one forced Tommy to enter the tournament just like no one forced me to eat those 16 cookies in one sitting. And we both paid the consequences: Tommy in the form of a potential court martial and mine in the form of an upset tummy. I’ll let you decide which punishment is worse.
I enjoyed “Warrior” a lot. I would even go so far as to say it’s one of the best movies I’ve seen this year which is saying a lot given my aforementioned “meh” attitude about MMA and the UFC. What separates the movie from a good sports movie to a great overall movie is the examination and “fly on the wall” perspective of the inner workings of this broken family as it tries to heal itself. Nolte as the father has the ability to be both heartbreaking as a man desperately trying to make amends yet still possess that terrifying darkness lurking just beneath the surface that makes his abominable past believable. The movie also benefits from great direction from Gavin O'Connor who previously skillfully directed “Miracle”. Here he’s given more leeway in the storytelling since he’s not telling a true story.
In the end, “Warrior” won’t boost your testosterone. In fact it could reduce you to tears which is a step in the opposite direction (unless you’re taking steroids in which case it’s just a side effect and you should see a doctor). By the time you get to the end credits you’ll have seen a superbly acted sports movie that offers you two sympathetic protagonists squaring off against each other and you really don’t know who will win or, more importantly, who you want to win. If you’re wondering if the film boosted my manliness, you’ll have to excuse me as I need to ice my wrists and treat myself to a juice box after typing this.
Monday, October 17, 2011
The Avengers
Due to the rise of Netflix and my own increasing frugality/laziness it's rare that I actually see a movie in theaters so I'm seeing most films at least five months after wide release but it allows me the option to pile on summer blockbuster after summer blockbuster. This is exactly how I came to watch Iron Man 2, Thor, Captain America, and X-Men: First Class which fully qualifies as a superhero bender. I was equally pleased with all of them but I was surprised at how much I enjoyed X-Men mostly because I was skeptical of how the origin story would hold up. I realized afterward that part of the reason I enjoyed it was because there were no countless references to the upcoming Avengers movie.
It's not that I didn't enjoy the other movies. I did. I thought Thor was very well done especially considering how difficult it is for the screenwriters and director to keep a movie about a Norse god living in a parallel dimension somewhat grounded in reality and able to live in the same fictional universe as the Iron Man and Hulk characters. Captain America was average and Iron Man 2 felt like two different movies. There was the Iron Man 2 sequel plot line and then there was the storyline Marvel clearly wanted added in as promo material for the Avengers.
It's not that this constitutes lazy writing or a cheap gimmick. (Tangent rant alert) Disney currently holds that belt for tacking on 3D technology to old animated films and regurgitating them back into theaters so the viewing public can not only pay theater prices to films they've already seen in theaters but also the public has the joy of paying an extra 4 to 5 bucks for a 3D ticket. Who can blame Disney though when nostalgia driven theater-goers put up $100 million in ticket sales to see The Lion King again? Given the success of The Lion King who knows to what movies Disney will apply 3D for re-release.

I'm looking forward to seeing sequels to Thor and Captain America where there is no need for mentioning the Avengers and the movie can just focus on those individual characters. Full disclosure: I'm fully aware of how much of a fan-boy I sound like in this posting.
As I said at the beginning, I'm looking forward to the Avengers movie coming out and I'm sure it will be incredibly entertaining. But part of the fun of superhero movies is that most superheroes are a bit of an underdog. We root for them because they take on evil individually even though the chances are small that they will succeed. Grouping them together stacks the deck to the level that it would be improbable that any villain could defeat them. The suspense is removed.
If only I could put this amount of effort and brain power into studying for the GMAT.
Regardless, it will be interesting to see if America embraces this concept of high profile individuals joining forces on the same team. It's not like there have been previous examples of this that the public has rebelled against right? Right?
